From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Jun 1 12:17:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED1B15BBB6C for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0150E8DF29 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B634915BBB6B; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D7A15BBB6A for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9DA8DF26 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732A21E494 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x51CH6qJ042888 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x51CH60V042882 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 12:17:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237632] security/ossec-hids: Update to 3.3.0 Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 12:17:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc flagtypes.name keywords short_desc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 12:17:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237632 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominik.lisiak@bemsoft.pl Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(domini | |k.lisiak@bemsoft.pl) Keywords| |needs-qa Summary|security/ossec-hids: update |security/ossec-hids: Update |from 3.1.0 to 3.3.0 |to 3.3.0 Status|New |Open --- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Dominik Lisiak from comment #10) If you could please confirm the latest change passes QA (poudriere) that wo= uld be great. "should" is good, but explicit testing and confirmation is much better.=20 And don't forget to set the maintainer-approval attachment flag (to "+") on attachments for ports you maintain. Attachment -> Details -> maintainer-approval [+] or select the flags value during attachment. Thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=