From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Oct 7 15:20:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA08382 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:20:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA08322 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id PAA16207; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810072220.PAA16207@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: Aled Morris Subject: Re: kern/8165: minor inconsistency in dirent.h Reply-To: Aled Morris Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/8165; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Aled Morris To: Bruce Evans Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/8165: minor inconsistency in dirent.h Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 23:17:53 +0100 (BST) On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Bruce Evans wrote: >>>Fix: >> >>to sys/dirent.h add #include >>and change "#define MAXNAMLEN 255" to "#define MAXNAMLEN NAME_MAX" > >This would pollute some more and is not permitted in the >_POSIX_SOURCE case. I understand what you're saying, but do you agree that having the same constant (i.e. constants with the same meaning) being defined in two places is bad? Aled -- tel +44 973 207987 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message