From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 17:35:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B704116A4D0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:35:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B8643D4C for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk) by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQ7U2-000KoW-NP; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:34:58 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQ7U2-0005il-Ea; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:34:58 +0100 To: karl@denninger.net, mkb@incubus.de, wmoran@potentialtech.com In-Reply-To: <20050422092220.C54895@denninger.net> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:34:58 +0100 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: jim-c@charter.net Subject: Re: Newbie Question About System Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:35:05 -0000 > Colocation that does not include serial console access is IMHO worthless. i;ve been following this discussion with interest - what advantages does a serial concolse give you over a colo's standard KVM access ? I've never used a serial consolve with FreeBSD, though I see the phrase crop up a lot. -pcf.