From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 29 04:14:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAC9C8851 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-p1.obspm.fr (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA 3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Jq535J62z49CB for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from io.chezmoi.fr (vpn.obspm.fr [145.238.186.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-p1.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id x7T4EhFA243709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:14:45 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:14:42 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: "Ireneusz Pluta/wp.pl" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Verry serious problem with ZFS & 12.0 Message-ID: <20190829041442.GA4697@io.chezmoi.fr> References: <20190828224547.GA1557@io.chezmoi.fr> <35b48e6a-67e1-6287-4e63-cf94b7445251@wp.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <35b48e6a-67e1-6287-4e63-cf94b7445251@wp.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:14:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at mx-p1.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Jq535J62z49CB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Albert.Shih@obspm.fr designates 145.238.193.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Albert.Shih@obspm.fr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.14)[-0.141,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[obspm.fr]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.47)[0.470,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[20.193.238.145.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.63)[asn: 2200(3.14), country: FR(-0.00)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[wp.pl]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2200, ipnet:145.238.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:14:48 -0000 Le 29/08/2019 à 06:01:01+0200, Ireneusz Pluta/wp.pl a écrit > W dniu 2019-08-29 o 00:45, Albert Shih pisze: > > 2/ Do you think that's a hardware/firmware problem or FreeBSD problem, > > the point is the second zpool are working perfectly so I'm thinking at > > some firmware/hardware/compatibility problem. > > It seems like related to this bug: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236480 I think so too. I just apply the patch, we going to see what's happen. Thanks for the help, before upgrading I was searching zfs freeze/hang (not deadlock) and don't find this bug. Regards. > -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: Thu 29 Aug 2019 06:13:35 AM CEST