From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 17 01:43:16 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01116A41F
	for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:43:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8073443D66
	for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:43:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 28033 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2005 01:43:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
	by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 17 Dec 2005 01:43:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 18819 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2005 01:43:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
	by 0 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2005 01:43:09 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135FB80C;
	Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:43:06 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:43:04 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20051217034304.5ed69ef1@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <43A36C4F.4010005@FreeBSD.org>
References: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org>
	<20051217000418.GC851@zaphod.nitro.dk>
	<43A35FA5.4050202@FreeBSD.org>
	<20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<43A36C4F.4010005@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:43:17 -0000

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:39:27 -0800
Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> 
> > Better use:
> > USE_RC_SUBR=	ike
> > and put the script in files/ike.in
> > 
> > Currently this will perform some substitutions on the script
> > (PREFEIX, etc.) and install it as ike.sh
> 
> Thanks for that, I wasn't aware that a .in vs. .sh.in was already
> working :)

Now:
USE_RC_SUBR= name.sh.in --> name.sh
USE_RC_SUBR= name.in --> name.sh
Then:
USE_RC_SUBR= name.sh.in --> name.sh
USE_RC_SUBR= name.in --> name

Is this not what we want ?


-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

Party-bug in the Aloha protocol