Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 14:19:30 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: dfr@render.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, tony@fit.qut.edu.au, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Per fs vnode pools (was Re: NFS Diskless Dispare...) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960808140146.11801B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960806102756.24224A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, I wrote: > > In effect, the ihash would become a vnhash and LRU for use in > > reclaiming vnode/inode pairs. This would be much more efficient > > than the current dual allocation sequence. Would you want this to be LRU vnodes with no buffer pages first? The buffer cache is being reclaimed, with some kind of algorithm, independent of the vnodes. You want to keep the vnodes with data still hanging off of them in the fs pool longer. BTW, is the incore inode table fixed or dynamic? Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960808140146.11801B-100000>