Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:49:34 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available Message-ID: <44bncjsn5d.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20150929213632.GA23442@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> (Baptiste Daroussin's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:36:32 %2B0200") References: <5609D023.70402@bluerosetech.com> <CAN6yY1tzo6QobOKqB53yKahC42rS3OnLMGKVTVnDOL%2BU3QfLhw@mail.gmail.com> <560A47FE.6010507@bluerosetech.com> <560AAD43.5000207@unfs.us> <560AF5CF.2080909@bluerosetech.com> <20150929213632.GA23442@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes: > The change that was made was having the default packages on releases point to > quarterly branch of the ports tree. This was noted in the release note. Yes, but that really only helps people who already understand version control. I'll try to come up with some text to add to the Handbook, which currently assumes (for ports) that there is only head.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44bncjsn5d.fsf>