From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 9 18:59:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA06705 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 18:59:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA06696 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 18:59:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id SAA14728; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 18:59:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611100259.SAA14728@relay.nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 18:59:24 -0800 From: obrien@NUXI.com (David E. O'Brien) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 contrib References: <199611090313.EAA04575@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199611090924.BAA03988@baloon.mimi.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.48.1-PL0 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 In-Reply-To: <199611090924.BAA03988@baloon.mimi.com>; from Satoshi Asami on Nov 9, 1996 01:24:19 -0800 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami writes: > * I gonna forward it to the XFree86 list. I'll keep you in the Cc for > * comments. > > Uh, I was hoping you or Rich would give me comments. ;) > > That was truly a shot in the dark, all the clue I had was an "#else /* > __bsdi__ */" and I don't know what BSDi's doing. i hope I didn't > embarrass myself.... W/o see the entire function, it is hard to say. But I can say that BSD/OS has a different interface for getting cpu usage from the kernel. I had to work thru this in my xcpustate port. They use getkerninfo() rather than our kvm_read(). -- -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)