From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 22:30:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAFD37B401 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA98543F3F for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:30:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bitblocks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5K5UNPF082420 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:30:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Message-Id: <200306200530.h5K5UNPF082420@bitblocks.com> To: chat@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:30:23 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Subject: FYI: Plan9 open sourced X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chat@freebsd.org List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 05:30:24 -0000 Basically the new license is very similar to BSD's (close enough for me). You may want to read license related threads on comp.os.plan9 to see what others have to say. http://plan9.bell-labs.com/hidden/newlicense.html If they had done this 12 years ago, the free OS landscape would've been very different.