Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:48:42 -0400
From:      Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
To:        Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: a sysctl for process binary osreldate
Message-ID:  <20120317224842.GA43874@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <86d38asyb5.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
References:  <8662e3m3eq.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120317203702.GA42572@DataIX.net> <86haxnrl6b.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120317212653.GS75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86d38asyb5.fsf@kopusha.home.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:26:53 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> 
>  KB> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>  >> 
>  >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>  >> 
>  >>  JH> Would this be a planned MFC to stable/N as well specifcially 8 ?
>  >> 
>  >> I plan to MFC to stable/9 if there is no objections.
> 
>  KB> I do not see why the merge to stable/8 cannot be done from the technical
>  KB> POV. If Mikolaj has no time or desire to merge to 8, I can help him.
> 
> If people consider this to be useful, no problem for me to merge to 8.
> 

I for one would. It would be nice to see this information on running
procs to verify there is not some old running binary that was left
behind in an upgrade.

-- 
;s =;



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120317224842.GA43874>