Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 May 2006 12:39:10 +0200
From:      Niclas Zeising <lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se>
To:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Close PR docs/68843
Message-ID:  <4469ABCE.4020304@n00b.apagnu.se>
In-Reply-To: <4468E077.1050206@freebsd.org>
References:  <44685292.6040409@n00b.apagnu.se> <4468E077.1050206@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> [Cleaning out gnats]
>> I think PR docs/68843 , also found here: 
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/68843 , can be closed.
>> The PR mentions that the manual pages for rc(8) and rc.subr(8) have 
>> different footers (with date and operating system version) depending on 
>> where you look at the page. The dates depends on when the last change to 
>> the manual page is done (when .Dd is bumped) and the version mentioned 
>> depends on which version of FreeBSD shows the manual.
>> If you look at a manual page on the web site the footer says FreeBSD 
>> 4.11, this should maybe be changed to 6.1 or something, but it's not 
>> that big of a deal.
> 
> Part of the reason for the different manpage footers is because the
> machine that serves the on-line manpages for the Web site is a FreeBSD
> 4.11 machine, so that's the OS revision that gets put into the footer.
> This is not to say this PR is any more or less relevant, but that's why
> it is the way it is.
> 
> I just realized this while I was investigating a nearby issue this morning.
> 
> Bruce.
> 

I figured it was something like that...
Nonetheless I think the PR can be closed since the issue brought up in 
the PR is no more.

//Niclas
-- 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4469ABCE.4020304>