From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jun 16 18:08:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA06439 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:08:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (0@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA06426 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:08:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.0/8.6.10) id SAA13660 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca(142.31.240.113), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdaannwa; Tue Jun 16 18:08:43 1998 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.0/8.6.10) id SAA07454 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806170108.SAA07454@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdqz7370; Tue Jun 16 18:08:11 1998 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-to: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: cy To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Snapshots Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:08:07 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am currently considering switching from -stable to -current. Would it be safe to assume that snapshots, e.g. 3.0-980520-SNAP, would be a little more stable than any other given moment's -current? Or is a snapshot just a point in time version of -current without regard to potential stability? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Government of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message