Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Nov 1998 11:28:48 -0400 (AST)
From:      The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu
Cc:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@nuxi.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject:   RE: ECGS ... 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811031126100.19544-100000@thelab.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <199811031523.KAA25107@hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998 alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu wrote:

> In Reply to Your Message of Tue, 03 Nov 1998 08: 58:05 -0400
> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 10:22:38 -0500
> From: Jerry Alexandratos <alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu>
> Message-ID:  <199811031022.aa10704@mail.eecis.udel.edu>
> 
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> says:
> : On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, David O'Brien wrote:
> : 
> : From what I'm gathering, it looks like EGCS went super-strict on the
> : conformance side, and MICO might be doing something that the 1.1.x series
> : of EGCS wasn't too strict about, which is causing the breakage...
> 
> MICO, early versions of Qt, older Gnome stuff, etc. all had problems
> with egcs.  You can say that they want super-strict on conformance,
> others would say that bad code was being written.

	Public Apology time...

	David...I misunderstood part of the issue...since it was reporting
'egcs-2.9x', I made the erroneous assumption that it was v2.9x ... it is
my understand since that point that it has more to do with trying to keep
the numbering in semi-line with GCC itself, and nothing more.

	the fact that it said 'experimental' lead me further to believe
that, similar to our 2.x vs 3.x strains...

	I my understanding is now correct, the next logical step for our
EGCS port to go is the 1.1.1 that is currently in pre-release?

Thanks...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811031126100.19544-100000>