From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 29 09:41:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292BA9D7 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bujackar@fel.cvut.cz) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53AF8FC1F for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CB419F32F4 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id TIljrf-D2Ixu for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2D519F33F6 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (karol.mk.cvut.cz [147.32.96.49]) (Authenticated sender: bujackar) by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8842C660904 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <508E4CF3.4060101@fel.cvut.cz> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:31 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?S2Fyb2wgQnVqYcSNZWs=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Famp Server References: <1351488821.57168.YahooMailNeo@web162303.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121029065057.GB10059@external.screwed.box> In-Reply-To: <20121029065057.GB10059@external.screwed.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:41:33 -0000 On 10/29/2012 7:50 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote: > I think this can be implemented as a 'metaport'. You may try to make > it yourself or ask someone else e. g., me. Hi, Do you mean something like misc/instant-server in ports? I never use that port, only noticed some days ago. Maybe this can be used/ajdusted? Karol