Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:27:28 +0100
From:      Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily
Message-ID:  <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-11-21 18:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> Nothing that stands out for me, but then I'm not into FreeBSD kernels.
>>> But there is certainly no more userspace processes running other than
>>> reboot.....
>>>
>>> Certainly no postfix, that could complain about missing libpcre.so.1
>>> That seems to be something that should have been flushed from the
>>> print_buffer before.
>>>
>>> What I do see i a huge amount of ZFS threads....
>>>
>>> Rebooting from DDB is instantaneously...
>>>
>>> So I'm not certain what to look for further?
>>
>> Perhaps share the output if you are able to capture it...
> 
> State of the init process should be more interesting.
> You can switch to it (using thread <id>) and capture its stack trace ('bt').

The box is not on a serial connection.
So capturing will be picture with Iphone and retyping it.

init process should be 1, right?
I'll give it a shot

--WjW







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AD0F00.5020600>