From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 3 21:59:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA20459 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 21:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20451 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 21:59:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) by paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.3/8.8.2) with ESMTP id VAA08584 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 21:59:40 -0800 (PST) From: Josh MacDonald Message-Id: <199702040559.VAA08584@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: g++, STL and -frepo on FreeBSD-2.2-Beta In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Jan 1997 18:14:33." <199702010114.SAA03677@phaeton.artisoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8577.855035973.1@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 21:59:35 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [code deleted] On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > It can't call the constructor, used implicitly in the list1 auto > declarator. It can't call the destructor, called implicily when the > list1 auto storage goes out of scope of main(). It can't call the > push_back member function, which is explicitly called. > > > Clearly, the template class definition > > template > class list ... { > ... > }; > > is not in scope. The header files you have included are apparently > not sufficient. > > Perhaps you meant "List" instead of "list"??? Clearly, you have no idea what you're talking about. You should be a bit more careful with your use of "clearly", it makes me wonder how much of the rest of your mail to this list (which I rarely understand) is correct. -josh