From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 17 19:21:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA28596 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 19:21:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA28589 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 19:21:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 1025G4-0000C7-00; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:21:44 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA43305; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:21:14 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199901180321.UAA43305@harmony.village.org> To: Chuck Robey Subject: Re: CTM <> CVSUP differences Cc: Boris Staeblow , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:46:23 EST." References: Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:21:13 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Chuck Robey writes: : In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability, : Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really consider other : places of corruption first. I've had problems when I get > 30 parts at one time on the fast list... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message