Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 May 2001 14:47:29 +0200
From:      "Andre Goeree" <abgoeree@uwnet.nl>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Multiple copies - was Re: rc script seems to be broken for nfs
Message-ID:  <20010514144729.A939@mandark.attica.home>
In-Reply-To: <20010514112258.L253@speedy.gsinet>; from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:22:58AM %2B0200
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105140155160.5337-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> <3AFEDE8A.6F7F01F2@math.missouri.edu> <20010514112258.L253@speedy.gsinet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 14:20 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > 
> > Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > > 
> > > is it only me, or has freebsd-stable been receiving multiple
> > > copies of this same message over and over again ?
> > 
> > It may be that people mail it multiple times.  [ ... reply and
> > reply-all aka group-reply functionality ... ]  People like me
> > are often too lazy to edit the list of recipients of the email.
> 
> Well, rumours say there's a great function called list-reply
> replying to the list _only_ -- but it's just too good an idea to
> be supported by the main stream MUAs ... :(

Mutt has this feature, i use it very well :-)

> 
> > One way to resolve this could be to change the majordomo
> > settings of the freebsd mailing lists so that the "Reply-To"
> > field is set to e.g. freebsd-stable.
> 
> NOOOOOO!  Please don't!
> 
> Sorry, but having suffered from this braindead "solution" before
> I will always argue against it and don't even want to hear people
> honestly suggest this.  See
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for the reasons
> why this is simply wrong.
> 
> > One disadvantage of this approach is that it is then not so
> > easy to reply only to the individual who sends the email.
> 
> It's not just a disadvantage.  It doesn't only prevent you from
> answering easily, often it even prevents you from answering at
> all.  Plus it violates POLA.  Considering Reply-To munging a
> solution can only stem from not understanding what the field is
> about.  It's owned by the originator and nobody merely
> transporting messages should even think about fumbling with it!
> 
> 
> virtually yours   82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4  61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
> Gerhard Sittig   true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
> -- 
>      If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
>              ask your parents or an adult to help you.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 

-- 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010514144729.A939>