From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 21:52:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A61106564A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AA48FC0C for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A123840002 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 9395440004; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A3A740002; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3X97MS0KC3z8gtM; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id uSocDTM1-fRP; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3X97MP4mP0z8gtL; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3X97MP4F3wz9CwX; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4C1228F2; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5043D521.4020105@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Kirchhoff References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radeon and xorg 7.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:52:38 -0000 On 09/01/12 01:57, Adam Kirchhoff wrote: > So no one knows what's going on here? What's the timetable for pushing > this into the ports tree, because I truly hope someone fixes this before > then :-) > > Adam > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Adam Kirchhoff > wrote: > >> >> The backtrace for the 'nv' driver is different, seemingly having nothing >> to do with libpciaccess. >> >> Should I open a pr for this problem? I'm hesitant to do so as this is not >> yet in the ports tree, and the CFT asked for feedback here. >> >> Just to clarify, this was built using the updated Xorg ports here: >> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/trunk >> >> The system is 9.1-RC1, amd64, though I have also tested on -CURRENT and >> -STABLE this weekend. >> >> I have attempted to just drop back to libpciaccess-0.12.1, but that >> doesn't seem to be enough. I have not yet tried to build X server 1.12.3 >> against the older libpciaccess (nor am I likely to get to that any time >> soon). >> >> Adam I take it this problem is with the libpciaccess that is in the development repository, not the regular ports tree. If so, the problem is known and being worked on. It will not be merged to the regular ports tree before this is resolved. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising