From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 20 15:53:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gandalf.vi.bravenet.com (gandalf.bravenet.com [139.142.105.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67E8337B491 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:53:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dphoenix@bravenet.com) Received: (qmail 19199 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Feb 2001 23:52:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2001 23:52:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:52:34 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Phoenix To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Jesper Skriver , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just curious how you pull this off? so 4 million/30=133 thousand emails per mail server roughly. So how do you distribute between the machines evenly ....into ezmlm as well? On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:35:31 -0800 (PST) > From: Gordon Tetlow > To: Dan Phoenix > Cc: Jesper Skriver , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > > Yep, that's 4 million unique emails. Actually, I should qualify that, it > > > took 4 hours for the mail servers to accept and queue them. The outgoing > > > probably took a bit longer, but from the way the queues stacked up, it > > > probably wasn't more than 5 hours to get all the deliverable messages out > > > (except for excite.com which wasn't taking mail at the time). > > > > when you say "about 30 mailers" are you talking about 30 separate > > machines? > > Yes, 30 machines that live to deliver. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message