From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 4 4:56: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from cip1.melaten.rwth-aachen.de (cip1.melaten.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.92.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC6737B424; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 04:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de (cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.92.12]) by cip1.melaten.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA28115; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:00:08 +0200 Received: (from tg@localhost) by cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA26146; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 13:57:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de) X-Authentication-Warning: cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de: tg set sender to tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de using -f To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Extending bsd.port.mk diagnostics when some of the patches fail to apply [patch for review] References: <39B377B3.B10E748C@FreeBSD.org> From: Thomas Gellekum In-Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev's message of "Mon, 04 Sep 2000 13:21:39 +0300" Date: 04 Sep 2000 13:57:48 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim Sobolev writes: > Hi, > > I'm sure all hardcore porters are aware of this problem: when you are trying to > update some port and not all patches applied cleanly there is no easy way to > figure from error message which patches have been applied and which one has > not. The following patch is expected to make a life of porter a bit easier by > extending verbosity of error messages in this case (it doesn't affect anything > if all patches were applied cleanly). What happened to PATCH_DEBUG? tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message