From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 13:39:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E5216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:39:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C525343D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:39:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dx3Ar-0005yQ-N1; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:39:27 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dx3Aq-000387-Rw; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:39:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:39:16 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Andreas Kohn In-Reply-To: <1122069468.2062.15.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> Message-ID: References: <1122069468.2062.15.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: -- Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Solved - Re: Eclipse 3.1, subclipse, javaSVN, kserel and 70% system use. X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:39:29 -0000 On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Andreas Kohn wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:58 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: > > (This appears to be a problem with both native 1.4.2 and 1.5.0 jdks on > > my -stable: an approximately GENERIC > > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 16 13:59:43 BST 2005) > > > > I use subversion for version control here, so I installed the latest > > subclipe (subclipe.tigris.org) and the tmate.org javaSVN libraries. > > > > [subclipse really slow] > > > > I can get a thread dump if anyone is interested but I'd like to actually > > get some confirmation that others are seeing this issue too. > > > > I did see the same after installing subclipse again into 3.1. Apparently > as my machine is a lot slower than yours (athlon 1200), I actually never > saw the operation complete. Eclipse-devel just hung early, just after it > painted itself for the first time. > > I didn't have much time then to figure out how to solve the problem. > Now, I reinstalled eclipse-devel (to test the latest patch), and also > reinstalled subclipse (after I saw your message). > I usually use subclipse with the JavaHL bindings[1]. Thanks to Mark Phippard, with whose advice I was able to sort this out. It appears that there's a bug in the currently released version of subclipse that causes it to run incredibly slowly for many operations. A version built against the head of the subclipse tree works fine - although I had to build javahl* in order to get it working, as javaSVN has not yet been updated for this version of subclipse. jan * A little makefile hackery required, as I've got apache2 installed, and the port/configure picks that up as opposed to the devel/apr port. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 9287088 or 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Strive to live every day as though it was last Wednesday.