From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 20:13:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8384616A4CE; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:13:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DA043D1F; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:13:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i62KC0xx040220; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i62KC0Dr003527; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i62KC0tt003526; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040702201200.GA3485@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040630164047.GC86725@ip.net.ua> <20040702162001.GD78489@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040702184443.GB4193@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702184443.GB4193@ip.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Query on status of cross-builds X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 20:13:41 -0000 On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:20:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > - ia64: internal errors in ld(1) > > > > Way, way at the bottom of my task list. > > Others are certainly free to look into this. > > > Marcel sent you a patch that fixes BFD configuration for ia64 > on 32-bit machines. > > > > - sparc64: generates bad assembler in gnu/usr.bin/tar > > > > See ia64 responce above. > > > sparc64 will probably need the same patch. No. It's a compiler bug on sparc64. I think the old binutils just didn't complain about the invalid instruction. I compared the output of the native cc and the cross cc and they are different. Not much, but fataly so. It'll be interesting to see if gcc 3.4 fixes this... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net