From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 19:20:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97614548 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8411E14EF for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3IJK1fD061435 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s3IJK1vm061434; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201404181920.s3IJK1vm061434@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: ports/186563: databases/postgis21: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ICONV_SET_TRANSLITERATE' X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: "O. Hartmann" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/186563; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "O. Hartmann" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/186563: databases/postgis21: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ICONV_SET_TRANSLITERATE' Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:13:29 +0200 --Sig_/fzf3GWM+DDLyDUPMGtqLsv= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This problem is still present and the offered patch is working. Why isn't i= t committed yet? --Sig_/fzf3GWM+DDLyDUPMGtqLsv= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTUXllAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8+0sIAKd3+cRAxfVSAeZitOrQU1CR t8III1zJFz62Boq3drqw7XRMh47d3nPH2jeCQ0CejbmSGpUKmL0lJBA0hrtNrayq KPJBKTtVorbUsvuOkWI5QnGfcWgJVM6e5A04twG5lhZPlbULCqdTYSjCUaFhuXGU JSc75ZB4TvO41naQGkcdoOWYfE5iB4pNPhK59RIfD0iD2eqqXfobh3Rg1tRgdsv3 eRcKNZ5/3REZXn52+TiEHNRYgS+O3+zVbtFCw3cgHP+m5cgIwUsMrxxG2o9d+JCy XgNuBBt3By1x7HjxKirmhPQDTkc9CkEoy58loezhB/I97tQOtIMcBRi2pS97suo= =7qz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fzf3GWM+DDLyDUPMGtqLsv=--