From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 27 01:04:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA28649 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 01:04:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from www.scancall.no (www.scancall.no [195.139.183.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA28643 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 01:04:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no) Received: from super2.langesund.scancall.no [195.139.183.29] by www with smtp id KHUZWJJJ; Fri, 27 Nov 98 09:04:18 GMT (PowerWeb version 4.04r6) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19981127100405.00946c60@mail.scancall.no> X-Sender: Marius@mail.scancall.no X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 10:04:05 +0100 To: Adrian Filipi-Martin , Artur Grabowski From: Marius Bendiksen Subject: Re: Merging Net/Free/Open-BSD together against Linux Cc: Greg Lehey , Alicia da Conceicao , netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG, FreeBSD advocacy list , advocacy@openbsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So, again, who would like to participate on such a project, >scanctioned by a *BSD core team, or not? The michanics of the process are >fairly straight forward, but they are time intensive. If sanctioned by the (in my case) FreeBSD core team, and not directly opposed by the others, sign me up. I don't have the experience yet, but this is a good thing, IMO. --- Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message