From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 31 09:18:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8248E67C; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CB0254E; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA24201; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:08:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VFhAP-000DCM-E1; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:08:25 +0300 Message-ID: <5221B24F.4040800@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:07:27 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d@delphij.net Subject: Re: svn commit: r254585 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs References: <201308202231.r7KMVERi068300@svn.freebsd.org> <20130825221517.GM24767@caravan.chchile.org> <521B75CE.70103@FreeBSD.org> <521BDEAC.9080909@delphij.net> <521C5CAC.2060400@FreeBSD.org> <521D4C41.3060208@delphij.net> <52211CF0.1070807@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <52211CF0.1070807@delphij.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Davide Italiano , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Xin LI , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin Belousov , Xin Li X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:18:50 -0000 on 31/08/2013 01:30 Xin Li said the following: > I've re-examined the code with some instruments and it looks like the case > where tdzp and sdzp have different z_zfsvfs were caught by upper layer in > our VFS. I don't believe this to be true. -- Andriy Gapon