From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 8 01:27:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA22889 for current-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 01:27:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA22881 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 01:27:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id KAA29320; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:22:17 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id KAA08304; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:22:17 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.4/8.6.9) id KAA13333; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:07:37 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:07:37 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Cc: G.Beuermann@Uni-Koeln.DE Subject: Re: X11R6.3 in 2.2 ? References: <27801.852684485@time.cdrom.com> <199701080208.NAA19096@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199701080208.NAA19096@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>; from David Dawes on Jan 8, 1997 13:08:34 +1100 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As David Dawes wrote: > The stock R6.3 release should compile pretty much "out of the box" on > FreeBSD 2.1.6 and later anyway. R6.3 includes the XFree86 3.2 > servers (except for a few minor things). However, i think we better use an official XFree86 release (3.2 in this case) for our release. This eases support questions. Of course, something like the xload fix would be preferrable... and i also see that XFree86 3.2 is useless for KOI8-R users. Any chance of a 3.2-u1 version? :) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)