From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 10:44:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE55B16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:44:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from royk.itea.ntnu.no (royk.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709D243D1D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-current@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D5966DCA for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mirrorball.thelosingend.net (m069c.studby.ntnu.no [129.241.130.69]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 18483 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 10:44:11 -0000 Received: from m190d.studby.ntnu.no (129.241.131.190) by m069c.studby.ntnu.no with QMQP; 4 Jan 2005 10:44:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2005 10:44:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:11 +0100 (CET) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050104.032929.102142020.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20050104114308.D30830@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <41DA2AE0.3020108@elischer.org> <20050104.032929.102142020.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. cc: julian@elischer.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a boot sector guru in the house? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:44:14 -0000 * M. Warner Losh [2005-01-04 03:29 -0700] > The first hunk of the patch is good. The final hunk (#ifdef BEL) is > unreleated, so please don't apply it. According to the patch author: To make the patch fit into the code I had to disable the "beep-signal". ...looks related to me.