Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:55:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 231043] archivers/urbackup-client: Fix database snapshot scripts and do port cleanup
Message-ID:  <bug-231043-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231043

            Bug ID: 231043
           Summary: archivers/urbackup-client: Fix database snapshot
                    scripts and do port cleanup
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: freebsd@coombscloud.com

Created attachment 196725
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D196725&action=
=3Dedit
Ver2.2.6 Rev2 patch for urbackup-client

archivers/urbackup-client: Fix database snapshot scripts and do port cleanup

Port did not properly perform a substitution in the database snapshot scrip=
ts
in %%PREFIX%%/share/urbackup/scripts during installation, leading to an err=
or
in the logs and an inability to use the backup scripts.

* Addresses database script substitution error
* Port cleanup:
  - Regenerate patches using "make makepatch" to silence portlint
  - Remove unneeded dependency on gettext
  - Patch Makefile.am to address errors leading to the distribution's "inst=
all"
target failing. As a result, use the distribution's "install" target, rather
than performing installation in port's Makefile, greatly simplifying the po=
rt's
Makefile.

portlint: OK (looks fine)
testport: OK (poudriere: 111i386, 111amd64, 112amd64)

NOTE: Since the initial 2.2.6 update I have been getting emails from
pkg-fallout@freebsd.org regarding failed builds due to automake being missi=
ng.
I could only intermittently reproduce this error, both using 'poudriere
testport' and in my own ports tree. In my ports tree, if I encountered the
error a 'make clean' would resolve it (i.e., the next build would succeed).=
 In
many test builds of the current patch I have not encountered this error. The
error seems to have gone away after regenerating the patches using "make
makepatch" rather than using "svn diff".

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-231043-7788>