From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 13 12:17:43 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B37814C4A
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by misha.cisco.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id PAA92766;
	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199904131914.PAA92766@misha.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: cvsup
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990413082930.jdp@polstra.com> from John Polstra at "Apr 13, 1999 08:29:30 am"
To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

John Polstra once wrote:

> > As a data point, CVSup runs nicely, but if I iconify it and
> > deiconify it, it takes about forEVER (maybe 10, 15 seconds on a PPro
> > 180) to redisplay itself completely.
 
> Yes, that's when the problem is most obvious.
> 
> Here's the bottom line from my point of view. CVSup is slow to update
> the GUI because it is busy doing more important things, i.e., updating
> your files as quickly as it can. I agree that it can be annoying. But
> would you really want me to slow down file updates just so the GUI
> could look better?

No-no :-), please, don't... However, the CPU is not 100% busy, and
the cvsup is still slow to update sometimes... Updating it does
not need anything but the CPU, does it (on the local display)?

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message