From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 06:27:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9D8106564A; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ds@ukrhub.net) Received: from storm.ukrhub.net (storm.ukrhub.net [212.90.160.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B39D8FC08; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by storm.ukrhub.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 5A6664AC58; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:09:39 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on storm.ukrhub.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from chaos.ukrhub.net (chaos.ukrhub.net [212.90.160.54]) by storm.ukrhub.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9D14AC3D; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:09:36 +0300 (EEST) Received: by chaos.ukrhub.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53075410B; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:09:36 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:09:36 +0300 From: Taras Korenko To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20110823060936.GA19211@chaos.ukrhub.net> References: <201108182253.p7IMr0us086588@red.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-u Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key: http://chaos.ukrhub.net/ds.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5128 2A8B 9BC1 A664 21E0 1E61 D838 54D3 8ACC C68B Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/159897: [patch] improve HAST section of Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Taras Korenko List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:27:10 -0000 On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:08:09PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > >On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Warren Block wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Warren Block wrote: > >>> > >>>>- File system agnostic, thus allowing to use any file > >>>>+ File system agnostic, thus allowing use of any file > >>> > >>>I think "allowing the use" is better here. > >> > >>"allowing any" might be even better. > > > >I don't think that would be correct usage -- "allowing any file system" to > >do what? > > Allowing any file system versus allowing only file systems made for > HAST. Looking at it again, the problem is the word "allowing". What > this is really saying is: "File system agnostic, compatible with any > file system supported by &os;." > File system agnostic, thus allowing laying out any file system supported by &os;. -- Best regards, Taras Korenko