From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 17 23:19:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9343537B688 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 23:19:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.freebsd.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14052; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:19:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Build status In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:47:15 MDT." <200004172247.QAA85536@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:19:04 +0200 Message-ID: <14050.956038744@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200004172247.QAA85536@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >It isn't something specific to Poul's system. I've recreated it here >as well. I've also tracked it down to the -fno-builtin that is in >LINT, but not in GENERIC. Now, to think about what to do about it... It is to be left there to catch people who use functions which are not in the kernel, but which gcc implements as built-ins :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message