From owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 23 20:53:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A1C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-libh@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f18.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD06943D39
	for <freebsd-libh@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imgaolong@hotmail.com)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Sun, 23 May 2004 20:52:33 -0700
Received: from 61.187.16.2 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 24 May 2004 03:52:33 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [61.187.16.2]
X-Originating-Email: [imgaolong@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: imgaolong@hotmail.com
From: =?gb2312?B?0KEgt8nn5w==?= <imgaolong@hotmail.com>
To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 11:52:33 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed
Message-ID: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2004 03:52:33.0461 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8B572E50:01C44142]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 May 2004 04:58:45 -0700
Subject: LibH or Anaconda ??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dedicated to libh code development <freebsd-libh.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh>,
	<mailto:freebsd-libh-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-libh>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-libh@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-libh-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh>,
	<mailto:freebsd-libh-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 03:53:29 -0000


 It is a pitty to hear the difficulties in libh, but the interesting thing 
is that we 
group have already ported the anaconda (linux installer) on a FreeBSD 
kernel to perform 
the entire install process in a commonly accepted graphical GUI manner of 
most currently 
used Linux releases. Using the linux.ko , and a rewrited partitioning GUI 
tool , we can 
install any compatibale RPM format packages of any Linux releases, well , 
after the 
install , the box has to be look completely like a linux box:->

  So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than rewriting a 
completely 
different architecture for the installer ?

_________________________________________________________________
享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统— MSN Hotmail。  http://www.hotmail.com