From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jun  6 07:47:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA23025
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 07:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from devsys.jaguNET.com (devsys.jaguNET.com [206.156.208.6])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA23020
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 07:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id KAA01103; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 10:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199706061446.KAA01103@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Micro$oft FrontPage extensions?
To: kev@lab321.ru (Eugeny Kuzakov)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 10:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jim@jaguNET.com, et@space.net, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.95.970606210750.24961A-100000@lab321.ru> from "Eugeny Kuzakov" at Jun 6, 97 09:09:01 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Eugeny Kuzakov wrote:
> 
> > For some, the use of binaries without source is enough of a risk to
> > avoid it though. Consider this, you're running FreeBSD and you have
> > FULL access to the source if you want it, same with Apache. Yet to
> > use FrontPage you have to plop a binary that you cannot check or
> > modify on your server... For some, that may not be acceptable. Nothing
> > wrong about that at all, just a matter of differing opinions.

> I agree with you, but you may setup Apache to not allow access to run
> MS FP Ext. binary extensions...
> 

I may not be getting the point, but if you don't allow Apache to
run the binary extensions, why install them?

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"