Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:28:44 -0500
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: r343567 aka PAE vs non-PAE merge breaks i386 freebsd
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2C31nCi_W3utw5voKQSv8B=9JjLNuceZURpvrCEcLn4Sw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55eb26fb977fe90e323a8721e39bfc0185d994ba.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <20190222033924.GA25285@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190222060410.GA25817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190223032644.GA14058@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAG6CVpW7y1qwxeU_gNWGmnKsgUkXKUTnmSwd3O2ByPdo_EO3uw@mail.gmail.com> <20190223163947.GB18805@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <f38f2329-900b-2ae2-02e6-e1b993f9250a@FreeBSD.org> <20190228183214.GA17372@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAG6CVpWasUzvHv56t8trK_6=wr-o_w4PnNDUir-Ye=kQXofoOQ@mail.gmail.com> <55eb26fb977fe90e323a8721e39bfc0185d994ba.camel@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 14:13, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> I have been of the opinion that armv[67] has met all the bullet points
> to be a tier-1 arch for several years, but nobody seemed interested in
> declaring it so.  Now it'll never happen, because there seems to be
> growing momentum to throw everything 32-bit under the bus and declare
> freebsd to be a 64-bit-only OS.  Netflix wins; those of us building
> smaller embedded products will eventually be forced to move to linux.

I don't think this is the case. For one example, see the effort kib@
has been putting in (under Foundation sponsorship) on FreeBSD/i386.
One of my co-op students this term is working on building out our
hardware continuous integration testbed, including 32-bit Arm targets
like the BeagleBone Black.

Now, i386 has not been our primary reference platform for some time,
and I expect that for 32-bit ports FreeBSD will largely be cross-built
from amd64, arm64, or powerpc64 hosts. I think this is absolutely
fine, and we can still support 32-bit devices well, but our current
tier definitions don't fit this model well.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2C31nCi_W3utw5voKQSv8B=9JjLNuceZURpvrCEcLn4Sw>