From owner-cvs-ports  Wed Jun  4 17:09:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA09945
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09732;
          Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA01706; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706050008.RAA01706@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr
CC: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <9706041457.AA18839@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Wed, 4 Jun 97 15:57:38 +0100)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports INDEX
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Do the 1000th port committer win something? :-)

I'm sure Jordan can arrange something.  How about thud's old
processor?  That's gotta count for something, we have been building
packages on that machine for a long time.... :)

Satoshi