From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 17:25:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05AB16A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:25:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DEBC43D2D for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:25:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 49844 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Jun 2004 17:25:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <40D301DB.3030303@icyb.net.ua> Message-ID: <20040618102523.Q49727@root.org> References: <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE0550120C936@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <40D301DB.3030303@icyb.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: "Moore, Robert" Subject: Re: kernel trap with ACPI on 4.10-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:26:00 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 18.06.2004 17:43 Moore, Robert said the following: > > This has been fixed for some number of months. What version of ACPI CA > > are you using? > > >>Looking at the code present in 4.10 (file revision 75) it seems that > ... > >>I see that this function was made sane in the code imported in CURRENT > >>(file revision 80). > > Yes, I saw it. I was talking about ACPICA in 4.10 and the particular > kernel trap I had had with it. Or, perhaps, ACPI in stable is > unmaintained and not-to-be-used ? ACPI in 4.x is not well-maintained. The version is 200302xx. I still think it would be good to fix your problem. -Nate