From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 19 19:27:37 2007
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B106916A421;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:27:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9787113C46A;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:27:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 6E5488C0C1; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:08:51 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:08:51 -0600
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20071119190851.GA23192@soaustin.net>
References: <200711191717.lAJHHdiv023011@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<alpine.BSF.0.99999.0711191102130.17967@ync.qbhto.arg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.0.99999.0711191102130.17967@ync.qbhto.arg>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-servers/xorg-server Makefile pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:27:37 -0000

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:02:56AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Since this is a non-trivial compile, is there any way to hide the 
> PORTREVISION bump inside the arch-specific section?

That would cause INDEX drift between the architectures, which is
undesirable.

Fortunately, xorg-server is a much quicker compile than the monolith
junk it replaced.

But yes, we discussed it on portmgr, and decided this was the way it
had to go.

mcl