From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 19:48:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A441065672; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (diana.db.net [66.113.102.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FAB8FC0A; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2372282A; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:29:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 259915C6E; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:31:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:31:01 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20100921193101.GA95238@night.db.net> References: <4C98F433.6070506@FreeBSD.org> <20100921191517.AF60A1CC3D@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100921191517.AF60A1CC3D@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Kamichoff Subject: Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:48:45 -0000 On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:06:43 -0700 > > From: Doug Barton > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 9/21/2010 4:43 AM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: > > | On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:34:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > |> | Although, that still does beg the question, > > |> > > |> No, it doesn't. :) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beg_the_question > > | > > | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beg_the_question#Modern_usage > > > > Yes, especially the last bit, "Usage commentators have deemed using the > > term in this way to be incorrect." :) > > Sadly, I must note that Edwin Newman > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Newman) passed away last month. I All I would add is: http://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=693 http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2290 > fear the common, totally illogical use of this phrase is now a lost > cause. I could care less (not sic). It is annoying yes. Language changes underneath us though. > > |> | why don't we want IPv6 enabled by default on new BIND installations? > > |> > > |> It has to do with whether or not IPv6 support is compiled into the > > |> FreeBSD base system which is compiling BIND. If the configure option ... > > If I'm still alive when IPv6 is the norm and IPv4 is the exception, I > > promise to give it another look. :) IPv6 is more prevalent than you think. I can't understand the illogic of turning it off. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" - Diane -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db