Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 23:35:56 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: a7469c9c0a50 - main - libc: bsort_s() requires both __BSD_VISIBLE and __EXT1_VISIBLE Message-ID: <c9798234-3b60-00dd-2c55-a6351d0a0c22@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <ZEBPQPzdmhhCNQ5I@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <202304192013.33JKDIrM070521@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <ZEBPQPzdmhhCNQ5I@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/19/23 22:29, Brooks Davis wrote: > This is a formal request to revert all commits related to bsort. It > should not have been committed without much broader discussion and IMO > does not belong in the tree. It certainly should not be in the tree > under such a generic name. > > -- Brooks Hi Brooks, I don't have an issue reverting my bsort() patch series, but please clarify your statement first. Who are "we" this time, representing this formal request for revert? Regarding "broader discussion" - what do you mean? The initial discussion was started last September: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch/2022-September/000225.html And several people have been asked for review and comments. Please elaborate what "broader discussion" means? Do you mean like getting something into ANSI first? I don't get it. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c9798234-3b60-00dd-2c55-a6351d0a0c22>