From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 18 23:58: 9 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 23:58:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E348237B400 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:58:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 864 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Dec 2000 07:57:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:57:06 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Jason DiCioccio Cc: 'Tomasz Paszkowski' , Pete Fritchman , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs Message-ID: <20001219095706.B345@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Jason DiCioccio , 'Tomasz Paszkowski' , Pete Fritchman , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <657B20E93E93D4118F9700D0B73CE3EA024337@goofy.epylon.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <657B20E93E93D4118F9700D0B73CE3EA024337@goofy.epylon.lan>; from Jason.DiCioccio@Epylon.com on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:51:21PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:51:21PM -0800, Jason DiCioccio wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > It is in 5.0, procfs is restricted via that MIB.. It was probably > considered too radical a change for the 4.x branch. I think it was not really considered too radical, rather it was given time to show off all its possible backsides before being introduced into -stable. G'luck, Peter -- If you think this sentence is confusing, then change one pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message