Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Feb 1999 02:19:41 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <dyson@iquest.net>
To:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: I'm outta here
Message-ID:  <199902230719.CAA02615@y.dyson.net>
In-Reply-To: <199902230448.UAA05278@kithrup.com> from Sean Eric Fagan at "Feb 22, 99 08:48:20 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean Eric Fagan said:
> For the past six weeks, this list has consisted of almost nothing but
> the twit brett's whines about linux and the GPL.
> 
> Here's a clue for all the needful:  anytime you need to build yourself
> up by attacking some other person, entity, or project, you're along the
> path of failure.
> 
I truely agree.  However, GPL has done so, by demonizing the notion
of owning your creations, especially if derived from other GPLed
works.  (Why is proprietary bad?  It is a choice...  Proprietary
works create an excellent opportunity of making a fair profit, which
can be used to pay bills, feed kids, help poor people, etc.)  It seems
that the GPL demonizes ownership of ideas, expensively
created (esp when derived from GPLed works :-))...  However, it is
not the *purpose* of all GPL authors (but only some) to demonize
others who might have to spend months or years on creations.  It is
only a side-effect in many cases, and has made progress partially
because it has been a default license of choice.

FreeBSD has to base itself on it's quality (by whatever measure), but
there are LOTS of types of quality.  One kind of quality is freedom
of use, modification and redistribution by those who get a copy of
FreeBSD.  There are areas where other OSes have better quality than
FreeBSD, but FreeBSD has to learn to capitalize better (in a figurative
sense) on it's advantages.  Sometimes comparison is very difficult
without showing the flaws that FreeBSD doesn't have (for certain
large classes of users and customers.)  It would be wonderful if
the common knowledge about licenses was more accurate, and more
information was common knowledge, but that is just not true.

Since this is a FreeBSD list, it seems that strategizing might be
sometimes (but not incessantly) appropriate here.  It does seem that
flaming isn't productive though, and there doesn't really seem like
there has been a lot of that recently.  Maybe some people have more zeal
than others, and if (zeal <= Stallmanzeal) or (zeal <= newLinuxUser),
what is wrong with that? :-). Sure, it might not be optimal, but where
in this world are things even nearly optimal?

-- 
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dyson@iquest.net      | it makes one look stupid
jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902230719.CAA02615>