Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 21:06:35 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: committer for Cassandra4 aarch64 fix? Message-ID: <650093909.4419.1609185995160@localhost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Looking for a committer for https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252068 ? Small fix for compilation on aarch64. Would be nice to have it in the 2021Q1 quarterly branch. Regards, Ronald From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 28 20:41:58 2020 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22864C09D1 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4TxL5CKnz4hb3; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-WLAN.fritz.box (p200300cd5f2f8c004063cfb69acd8fb0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f2f:8c00:4063:cfb6:9acd:8fb0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B38721B8A; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) To: abi <abi@abinet.ru> References: <20201226124150.7c494410@dismail.de> <6d0d128b-9a75-34f4-830c-d8be05ded9cb@freebsd.org> <X+hEUk7K92mi+Eca@home.opsec.eu> <X+hMcRqUX17XyyBQ@c720-r368166.fritz.box> <2128EDF2-39D7-4FF4-92AB-9F36FA4CAAC5@ellael.org> <20201227060021.3eb4148d@dismail.de> <7a0fc616-0805-e1c2-01cb-65186167ed2b@blackrosetech.com> <deb56698-d7ba-73f1-a0cf-1cf238055323@abinet.ru> <253cc0ef-edc3-bac6-72bd-90d82713f465@freebsd.org> <8959400d-b868-addf-8dd4-0e6890da9665@abinet.ru> From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portmaster new development Message-ID: <b71d6d4e-9471-13af-632a-aa09ad1cd202@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 21:41:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8959400d-b868-addf-8dd4-0e6890da9665@abinet.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bXnz9juykQa5eFm87KmhfpLaO7xu3cfMH" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:41:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bXnz9juykQa5eFm87KmhfpLaO7xu3cfMH Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gk9awu4Kg1yH0C5vmYlJzXYfWlc685E0s"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> To: abi <abi@abinet.ru> Cc: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <b71d6d4e-9471-13af-632a-aa09ad1cd202@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portmaster new development References: <20201226124150.7c494410@dismail.de> <6d0d128b-9a75-34f4-830c-d8be05ded9cb@freebsd.org> <X+hEUk7K92mi+Eca@home.opsec.eu> <X+hMcRqUX17XyyBQ@c720-r368166.fritz.box> <2128EDF2-39D7-4FF4-92AB-9F36FA4CAAC5@ellael.org> <20201227060021.3eb4148d@dismail.de> <7a0fc616-0805-e1c2-01cb-65186167ed2b@blackrosetech.com> <deb56698-d7ba-73f1-a0cf-1cf238055323@abinet.ru> <253cc0ef-edc3-bac6-72bd-90d82713f465@freebsd.org> <8959400d-b868-addf-8dd4-0e6890da9665@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <8959400d-b868-addf-8dd4-0e6890da9665@abinet.ru> --gk9awu4Kg1yH0C5vmYlJzXYfWlc685E0s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 28.12.20 um 15:04 schrieb abi via freebsd-ports: > On 28.12.2020 16:16, Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 28.12.20 um 11:11 schrieb abi via freebsd-ports:> I build my ports = >> in poudriere in VM without zfs or ssd on pre-Sandy >>> Bridge CPU. I don't have enough memory or disk space, so I don't use = >>> tmpfs or ccache either. I migrated from portmaster when it was=20 >>> abandoned several years ago and don't think I'll come back,=20 >>> especially if new portmaster will be written on bash. The idea behind= =20 >>> portmaster was zero dependencies, so it doesn't brake after major=20 >>> upgrades. >> >> You are free to use poudriere and it definitely is the official tool >> for FreeBSD package building (and I have to use it myself and it has >> cost me a lot of time rebuilding broken poudriere jails and keeping >> them in state that I can use them to test new ports on a number of >> different releases as well as i386 plus amd64). >> >> And while you are free to never again use portmaster, telling people >> that it has been abandoned is just a _lie_ and I'd want to ask you to >> stop telling it. It has been continuously maintained for decades. >> > I remember portmaster marked as deprecated in 2016. I've switched to=20 > poudriere because of that. So, it _was_ abandoned when I migrated. It i= s=20 > good that it is not, the more options - the better. But some people her= e=20 > telling that poudriere requires ZFS and powerful dedicated hardware, I = > just pointed that they are wrong. The portmaster port had been marked deprecated by the author of synth and this commit has been reverted by him on request of portmgr on the next day. The portmaster port has never been abandoned - it does not suffice that some unrelated committer considers his port management tool superior and decides to deprecate a "competing" one. Poudriere works best on sufficiently powerful build servers and it often requires rebuilding dependencies over hours when I just want to test a new port before committing it. My goal is to have portmaster build ports in a clean jail as synth does (restricted to i386 and amd64 due to the dependency on Ada) and poudriere do, but without giving up the ease of use of portmaster for other use cases. Regards, STefan --gk9awu4Kg1yH0C5vmYlJzXYfWlc685E0s-- --bXnz9juykQa5eFm87KmhfpLaO7xu3cfMH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAl/qQxEFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UQ2 qAgArAWvrETghVcjUDOPiHRgidVsB54myvStFl2/eIarhlU6WxlS/yl2rYYV3H0oeGuLpdEux9KV gIKE1BZbJhPL/cwH6BtV67Pb59Vkixj4AjGg820rGaFI6ZKjNm9FYam+r6Hb0MtqvxD8a533Wgng +IF56gzVEBVOlDgGfeZPRCx7AICDYjasTpj4XlAKIxs3+kg+ZN+KwNxRIPjbBoDvo5Kf4niZdUg0 IiY/V3xDNRUMbPCcypOEXxmveehHEEWkbJdnER816AGEN/eFQzvmRm65vBTO/u9EJmtYFO4Y6X1o ouTSNTYGOGTnqcmJ1gVXU16Bb385JooZz4N8ngQSJA== =TI2I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bXnz9juykQa5eFm87KmhfpLaO7xu3cfMH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?650093909.4419.1609185995160>