From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 26 21:58:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83540106564A for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4888FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1908348bwz.43 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:58:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KPpFb6VcpuyOkK76zlMZHxKo8/DoL+CU2tppKVEAN5g=; b=YXIutG27ey7A82C+Pth9SGoavASiaEroev+qf71Zg7l2NZxPS5QdPfQuUtaGaQochP BNmHKql5npDLKQ1EzYWv7/5sGXjPMpm1MdbL3O45LtsBtlCRicjedgmtWH5v6Ex6gCpK jkAOp6xSufP1ZgZDN3u8vH+9fwpxPRMXQEC0U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qAtDc0mA6fFkcajDbC0bt5Xt9wWby9GhOkjRihvFP8/sJD6g8lZNH2oqL/XwdhcBiS UJStOITTt6OfZQTup7TZot3w32DkPJ0jC1GB8PWm7rV38MjUhZuNgJ3DpF7miDpHupAt NsOptkTMyP+EQe4PNtxR02hfhbJLBWP/5nLGM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.155.13 with SMTP id g13mr242316hbc.7.1240783091487; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:58:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49F49FFF.1080708@rawbw.com> References: <49F49FFF.1080708@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:58:11 +0200 Message-ID: <3a142e750904261458i17ad3156k7b7e0ecf7a77b266@mail.gmail.com> From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: yuri@rawbw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is 'kldunload msdosfs_iconv' supposed to be safe? It hangs the system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:58:13 -0000 On 4/26/09, Yuri wrote: > I've compiled kernel without msdosfs. > When I mount some FAT system msdosfs.ko,msdosfs_iconv.ko,libiconv.ko are > being loaded. > When I unmount this FAT all those .ko modules stay. > 'kldunload msdosfs' unloads it ok. > But 'kldunload msdosfs_iconv' hangs OS immediately making it unusable. > > My guess is that there are some bugs in some of those modules. > Should I file a PR for this? This have been fixed at least in CURRENT. -- Paul