From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Jul 15 19:44: 0 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071937B5DC
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id LAA19904
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:43:55 +0900 (JST)
To: net@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: itojun's message of Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:02:45 JST.
      <7093.963367365@localhost>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: candidate fix to INET6 if detach problem 
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:43:55 +0900
Message-ID: <19902.963715435@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>	if you have FreeBSD-current on laptop, please try the following diff:
>	http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/freebsd4/sys/net/if.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
>	and let me know if it solves FreeBSD PR 17909 (panic on pccard
>	interface removal, if you have used IPv6 on the interface).
>	i'm still wondering if this should go into FreeBSD-current (and
>	4STABLE) or not, so your report will be very important.

	this now is in the main trunc.  please test.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message