From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 29 9:42:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from laf.cioe.com (laf.cioe.com [204.120.165.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3A71559A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mlinvill@cioe.com) Received: from localhost (mlinvill@localhost) by laf.cioe.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04202; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:42:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mlinvill@cioe.com) X-Authentication-Warning: laf.cioe.com: mlinvill owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:42:05 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Linvill Reply-To: mlinvill@winstar.com To: Arjan van der Oest Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetApp NFS & FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm using this combination on a live dialup billing implementation. FreeBSD xxxx 3.1-STABLE FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 4 14:16:28 CST 1999 root@xxxx:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 NetApp Release 5.2.2: Sat Apr 17 04:15:20 PDT 1999 NFS v3, no stability problems. PostgreSQL database, BTW. -Mark On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Arjan van der Oest wrote: >Hi, > >Is there anyone out there that uses this combination ? I've heard rumours >that due to some problems either with FreeBSD or ONTAP this combination >was not very reliable or didn't work at all. NetApp was unsure... > >ao >-- >arjan van der oest - systems administrator - arjan@nl.demon.net >Scottish Telecom - Demon Internet NOC Amsterdam - www.demon.nl >"mind over matter..." > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message