From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jun 11 23:07:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA08464 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 23:07:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rheingold.reed.edu (wcooley@c029h021.ipdorm.reed.edu [134.10.29.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA08447 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 23:07:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wcooley@nakedape.ml.org) Received: from localhost (wcooley@localhost) by rheingold.reed.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA18243; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 23:05:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 23:05:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "W. Reilly Cooley, Esq." X-Sender: wcooley@rheingold.reed.edu To: The Hermit Hacker cc: Terry Lambert , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius login via getty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > PAM has a number of known problems. > > > > Use SASL instead. Unlike PAM, thee is an RFC for SASL. > > Boy, does that ever make alot of sense...both Solaris and Linux > are adopting PAM as their authentication schemes, and are designing > various modules for it, but let's adopt something because, hey, it has an > RFC? I'm not sure if it counts, but there *is* an RFC for PAM--it's just not an IETF RFC, but rather an OSF RFC. http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pam/rfc86.0.txt Dein Wil -- ------------------------------------------------------------- W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. Naked Ape Consulting wcooley@nakedape.ml.org http://www.nakedape.ml.org Links page ----> http://www.nakedape.ml.org/links To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message