From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 28 11:07:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C61D106566C; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C6D8FC0A; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7SB7hnp077759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 07:07:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5A217F.4050105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 07:07:43 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <20110828030354.a53bf2ed.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110828030354.a53bf2ed.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 07:07:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ruby-gems update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:07:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 08/28/11 06:03, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to update our ruby-gems versio to 1.8.7. > Are there any objections? It seems that everything is > working fine with this version, and it includes a lot of > bugfixes, including better behaviour with ruby 1.9.2. > > I'm attaching the patch I'm planning to commit. If there's > no objection, I will commit it tomorrow. > > The patch also fixes the issue when rdocs were not installed > due to unexsisting directory (it also produced a broken plist > when you already had this directory, because it would not > include those files). > > Thanks! > You read my mind. This looks good to me, thanks! Long term I think we should consider a move away from using the version prefixes and support only one version of ruby installed at a time. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOWiF/AAoJEPXPYrMgexuhStAH/3oW1ysgKdd1qWnx79WS1ywE Dd7CJu8o0TBfUyLPpRhhaKcFel2jnq2bziBC9Av6gxSjkjZbSFCMqNd1dm0EgO76 MFjEJ/anF7sKo3gzBKR7SXjFSZZ+RW0rTJ8lB8UiCfp60tgZJvBLyjCJaBa4+VE2 KrToVlAmuTS1c+4h0ELQn0seF//rfvXSGNon8X72jcGu35IKSg8Ftjx4o4ZJdojr 7C6w0XGcp1aZUdJqyfKMW3FWBEp5561YHJSOgRSwD211ysWShX8GBBMJ0bWCBo6L IemDotDo1CLSEDvM9CR4Zsk3Z//dJJVYd4Z3nLVrQNi48z+Om69GKCLIjzO9HjM= =1uZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----