From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 20 02:03:15 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA18285 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 02:03:15 -0800 Received: from iaehv.IAEhv.nl (iaehv.IAEhv.nl [192.87.208.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA18272 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 02:03:09 -0800 Received: by iaehv.IAEhv.nl (8.6.11/1.63) id LAA11947; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:02:15 +0100 From: guido@IAEhv.nl (Guido van Rooij) Message-Id: <199503201002.LAA11947@iaehv.IAEhv.nl> X-Disclaimer: iaehv.nl is a public access UNIX system and cannot be held responsible for the opinions of its individual users. Subject: Re: restore times veryyyy long To: hsu@cs.hut.fi (Heikki Suonsivu) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:02:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: guido@IAEhv.nl, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199503200213.EAA03300@shadows.cs.hut.fi> from "Heikki Suonsivu" at Mar 20, 95 04:13:50 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 774 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Heikki Suonsivu wrote: > > What drive you have? We have got a WangDAT 3400DX and see similar problem, > about 12KB/s read performance, while writes work normally. The same drive > on a Sun SS10 works considerably better even though it is slower reading > than writing. Both Buslogic 445S and Adaptek 1542 behave similarly. > Restores have been so infrequent that I haven't had time to look at this > more closely, but it might be useful to get it solved. > > We also saw cache getting disabled on a HP drive, apparently by changing We do have an HP...: ncr0 targ 4 lun 0: > from read to write or vice versa, don't remember any more which way it was. > I understood that this was a bug in the drive. > Anyone can confirm this? -Guido