Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 10:26:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Jim Dutton <jimd@dutton4.it.siu.edu> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newer versions of bsd...mk files anywhere? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970414102212.2201A-100000@dutton4.it.siu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970414003638.7719U-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ummm - why should I have to worry about the blinking bsd.port.mk files? If an OS is released with 6 year old files, then it is the OS releasers that should make sure that the appropriate files are included in the OS release. On Mon, 14 Apr 1997, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Jim Dutton wrote: > > > Hmmm - the bsd.subdir.mk has a date of 2/1/91 in its internal comments, as > > does bsd.port.subdir.mk. > > > > The newer versions of the same files have an additional line with a 1997 > > date. How "stale" is stale?? > > I don't know. :) If it's a problem, you can bring the bsd.port.mk down > from -current and replace yours.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970414102212.2201A-100000>